Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion ; (12): 59-64, 2021.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-877550

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE@#To compare the clinical effect between electroacupuncture (EA) at Neima point and Neiguan (PC 6) and epidural nerve block for preemptive analgesia in patients undergoing thoracic surgery.@*METHODS@#Sixty patients with elective radical esophagectomy were randomly divided into a group A, a group B and a control group, 20 cases in each group. The patients in the group A were treated with injection of 20 mL 0.375% ropivacaine at epidural space 30 min before anesthesia induction, followed by normal anesthesia during operation; the patients in the group B were treated with 30 min EA at bilateral Neima point and Neiguan (PC 6) before anesthesia induction, followed by normal anesthesia during operation; the patients in the control group were treated with general anesthesia alone. Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia was applied for all the patients. The mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded at the following time points: before acupuncture/epidural puncture (T@*RESULTS@#The MAP at T@*CONCLUSION@#The preemptive analgesia of EA at Neima point and Neiguan (PC 6) and epidural nerve block could both provide effective perioperative analgesia for thoracic surgery. The EA could better maintain intraoperative hemodynamics and has less physiological disturbance.


Subject(s)
Humans , Anesthesia, General , Electroacupuncture , Epidural Space , Nerve Block , Thoracic Surgery
2.
Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion ; (12): 829-832, 2013.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-253875

ABSTRACT

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To observe the effectiveness and safety of electroacupuncture (EA) at Neimadian (Extra) and Neiguan (PC 6) for analgesia after thoracic surgery.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>One hundred and twenty cases of thoracic surgery were randomly divided into an electroacupuncture (EA) group (60 cases) and a medication group (60 cases). EA was applied at Neimadian (Extra) and Neiguan (PC 6) for postoperation analgesia in the EA group, while patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) was applied in the medication group. The score of visual analogue scale (VAS), analgesia effect, safety and beta-endorphin level after the treatment in both groups were compared.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Compared with those before the treatment, the VAS scores in every time point after surgery were decreased (all P < 0.05), which were lower in the EA group (P < 0.01). The excellent and good rates were 96.7% (58/60) and 75.0% (45/60) seperately, the analgesia effect in the EA group (2 h after operation) was superior to that in the medication group (P < 0.01). The safety degree in EA group was higher to that in the medication group (P < 0.01). Compared with that before the treatment, the beta-endorphin level in two groups after treatment was both increased, which was higher in the EA group (P < 0.01).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Electroacupuncture at Neimadian (Extra) and Neiguan (PC 6) has better analgesia effect (2 h after operation) and safety than PICA on analgesia after thoracic surgery.</p>


Subject(s)
Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Acupuncture Analgesia , Acupuncture Points , Electroacupuncture , Pain, Postoperative , Blood , Therapeutics , Thoracic Surgery , beta-Endorphin , Blood
3.
Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion ; (12): 738-742, 2011.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-263130

ABSTRACT

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To observe the analgesia effectiveness and safety of electroacupuncture at Neimadian(Extra) for postoperation of abdominal surgery.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>One hundred and twenty patients with routine abdominal surgery were randomly divided into an acupuncture group and a medication group, 60 cases in each group. The acupuncture group was treated with electroacupuncture at Neimadian(Extra), which was located on the inside of lower leg, 7 cun above the internal malleolus and 0.5 cun from post edge of tibial. The medication group was treated with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) with Sufentanil. After the treatment, the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), the security, the analgesic effect and beta-endorphin content were compared.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The postoperative VAS score at 2, 4, 8, 16, 24 and 48 h in the acupuncture group was lower than those in the medication group (all P < 0.05). The analgesic effect at 2, 4, 16 and 24 h after surgery in the acupuncture group were superior to those in the medication group (P < 0.05, P < 0.01). The beta-endorphin content at 0, 8, 16 and 48 h after surgery in both groups were increased, and the acupuncture group was superior to the medication group (all P < 0.05). The security class after surgery in the acupuncture group was higher than that in the medication group (P < 0.05).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>The analgesic effect and safety of electroacupuncture at Neimadian(Extra) in postoperation of abdominal surgery are superior to those of the PCIA with Sufentanil.</p>


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Abdomen , General Surgery , Acupuncture Analgesia , Acupuncture Points , Electroacupuncture , Pain, Postoperative , Blood , Therapeutics , beta-Endorphin , Blood
4.
Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion ; (12): 675-677, 2005.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-245155

ABSTRACT

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To observe effectiveness and safety of electroacupuncture at Neimadian for analgesia in the extremities after orthopedic operation.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Two hundred cases enrolled were divided into two groups. The test group of 100 cases were treated with electroacupuncture at Neimadian and oral administration of placebo, and the control group of 100 cases with oral administration of tramadoli hydrochloride.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The mean score for pain signs at all the time points before and after analgesic treatment in the test group had more decreases as compared with the control group (P < 0.001); and in the good rate after treatment, the test group was higher than the control group (P < 0.001, P < 0.05), and for safety, the test group was higher than the control group (P < 0.001).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>The analgesic effect and safety of electroacupuncture at Neimadian are superior to the routine analgesic after operation of the extremities.</p>


Subject(s)
Humans , Acupuncture Analgesia , Analgesics , Electroacupuncture , Pain Management
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL